Home » 2015 » January

Monthly Archives: January 2015

Contraception Causes Brain Cancer

Since its creation, science and the Church have warned of the dangers of chemical birth control. From heart related problems, hormonal problems, blood clots and cancer; birth control does more harm than the supposed good some feminists and others posit.  Well there is now a new harm: brain cancer.  According to a new study found in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, prolonged used of hormonal contraceptives by younger women can lead to a significant risk for glioma.  Glioma is a tumor that grows in the spine and brain.  Glial cells mutate and effect the nervous system.  Symptoms of this tumor are headaches, vomiting, nausea, seizures and visual loss.  Over 2,000 women were part of the study ranging from ages 15 to 49.

Hopefully this study will further persuade women not to harm their bodies with these unnatural forms of birth control.  Anything that alters the hormones of the body will disrupt the body’s mechanism.  This disruption can cause all kinds of problems. The human body is a complex collection of cells, tissues, hormones and genes directing all the above. If we tamper with this harmony of chemicals and tissue, then expect the body to react negatively.

Source:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.12535/abstract

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/838563

http://time.com/3677129/birth-control-risks-may-include-brain-cancer/

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/oral-contraceptives-linked-to-significantly-increased-risk-of-rare-brain-ca

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/birth-control-pill-may-be-linked-to-rare-brain-tumors/

http://www.prevention.com/health/health-concerns/birth-control-links-brain-cancer

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11361250/Taking-contraceptive-pill-for-five-year-doubles-risk-of-brain-tumour-warn-scientists.html

http://www.foxnews.com/health/2015/01/22/taking-contraceptive-for-five-years-doubles-risk-developing-brain-tumor-study/

Gospel of Mark Find

A new discovery has atheists nervous. This discovery may add further validity to the Gospels in an academic sense. For decades, atheists, skeptics, and some scholars have cast doubt on the Gospels. This doubt would eventually lead to the conclusion that Jesus Christ is nothing more than a myth or a story created in the 2nd or 3rd centuries.

So What Happened?
In Egypt of all places, a funeral mask made of (papyrus) paper was discovered to have a fragment of the Gospel of Mark.  Why is this significant?  Well, the fragment is said to date from the 1st century or 80/90 AD.  The Gospel texts available now are of the 2nd century.  This time discrepancy is one of the reasons why atheists and others believe Jesus never existed.  Why would the story of someone appear centuries after he/she allegedly existed?

Who Cares?
With this new fragment, we can tell that the Gospel was in fact written during or even shortly after Christ walked this Earth.  Since this fragment is a copy, then that means there is an original one that is even older out there. This is big news! The discovery of this fragment gives hope to the possibility that we may even find older copies or even originals.  Not only was this fragment discovered, but also documents such as Classical Greek literature, poems, business documents, letters, even stories and poems from Homer.  Craig Evans, a professor of New Testament studies at Acadia Divinity College in Wolfville, Nova Scotia said:

“We’re recovering ancient documents from the first, second and third centuries.”

Why Was The Fragment In a Funeral Mask?
At the time, papyrus was extremely expensive.  People recycled sheets that already were used or were written upon. Egyptian royalty had golden masks, but the poor had to resort to using used written paper.

Biblical scholar Bart Ehrman seemed a bit upset at the discovery. He took to Facebook to complain that the mask was being destroyed in favor of recovering ancient texts.

“This complete disregard for the sanctity of surviving antiquities is, for many, many of us not just puzzling but flat-out distressing. It appears that the people behind and the people doing this destruction of antiquities are all conservative evangelical Christians, who care nothing about the preservation of the past – they care only about getting their paws on a small fragment of a manuscript. Can there be any question that with them we are not dealing with historians but Christian apologists?” –https://www.facebook.com/AuthorBartEhrman/posts/809740275764435

“Disregard for the sanctity of surviving antiquities…” seriously?  Ehrman seems paranoid in his post. What academic would ignore the wealth of texts found in these funeral masks?  There so much we can find in them.  Scientists have found a way to remove the papyrus and the glue used in a way that does not destroy the papyrus and its content.  However in doing so, the mask is destroyed since it is made of this papyrus. Nevertheless, if we continue finding more evidence that Jesus was, in fact, a real person, then this is a good thing.  What will atheists have to say now?

Source:

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/mummy-mask-found-contain-oldest-known-gospel-first-century-ad-1484086

http://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/mummy-mask-may-reveal-oldest-known-gospel-n289006

http://www.catholic.org/news/international/americas/story.php?id=58487

http://national.deseretnews.com/article/3334/Have-we-found-the-oldest-manuscript-of-Marks-Gospel-An-ancient-mummy-mask-may-have-the-answer.html

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/bibleandculture/2015/01/20/earliest-fragment-of-marks-gospel-apparently-found/

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/geneveith/2015/01/gospel-of-mark-fragment-from-before-90-a-d/

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2015/01/22/mummy-mask-papyrus-may-reveal-oldest-known-gospel/

http://www.gospelherald.com/articles/54071/20150121/gospel-of-mark-manuscript-discovered-in-mummy-mask-thought-to-be-earliest-copy-of-new-testament-text.htm

http://metro.co.uk/2015/01/20/does-this-mummy-mask-contain-the-worlds-oldest-gospel-5029707/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/01/20/biblical-scholar-says-hes-found-the-oldest-known-gospel-inside-a-mummy-mask/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/23/gospel-mummy_n_6527176.html

http://conservativetribune.com/biblical-discovery-atheists-not-happy/

Christian Lies- A lot of Malarkey

“And Jesus answered them, ‘See that no one leads you astray.’” – Matthew 24:4

In 2004, Alex Malarkey, 6 years old would be in a traffic accident that would change his life.  He would suffer severe injuries to his spine, neck and even brain trauma.  After it was said it done, he became a quadriplegic.  However, Malarkey said that he saw angels catching his father in mid-flight as he was ejected from the vehicle.  He went to heaven and met Jesus as well as Satan. His account was so powerful that it was published in 2010 by Christian publisher, Tyndale House in the book, “The Boy Who Came Back from Heaven.”

The book became an instant hit selling over 1 million copies and was on the best-selling list.  Many people described being moved by the boy’s story.  It increased their faith.  The audience of this book is mostly Evangelical Protestants and some curious readers looking to read on what is now coined as “Heaven Tourism” stories.

This is not the first time a book of this nature has ever been written.  Many people claim to have died and “gone to heaven.” They recall vivid images of watching themselves on operating rooms aas well as their travels to other dimensions and even heaven. Malarkey’s story touched even more because it came from a young boy.  However, there is a problem.  The story is a lie.

Alex Malarkey wrote an open letter to Christian stores stating that he never died nor went to heaven.  The letter was posted on the blog, pulpitandpen.org blog.

“An Open Letter to Lifeway and Other Sellers, Buyers, and Marketers of Heaven Tourism, by the Boy Who Did Not Come Back From Heaven.”

Please forgive the brevity, but because of my limitations I have to keep this short.
I did not die. I did not go to Heaven.
I said I went to heaven because I thought it would get me attention. When I made the claims that I did, I had never read the Bible. People have profited from lies, and continue to. They should read the Bible, which is enough. The Bible is the only source of truth.

Anything written by man cannot be infallible.
It is only through repentance of your sins and a belief in Jesus as the Son of God, who died for your sins (even though he committed none of his own) so that you can be forgiven may you learn of Heaven outside of what is written in the Bible…not by reading a work of man. I want the whole world to know that the Bible is sufficient. Those who market these materials must be called to repent and hold the Bible as enough.

In Christ,
Alex Malarkey.”

Immediately, bookstores stopped selling the book and have pulled it off their shelves.  A spokesperson for Tyndale House stated that the book will no longer be produced.  The family of the boy claimed that they have complained about the book as having inaccuracies and exaggerated claims.

My Thoughts:

Every time I heard of these death experiences that result in a person meeting God or getting a tour of heaven, I am extremely skeptical.  While I am not saying that these events may not happen -I was not there – what I am saying is that there are psychological explanations for these events.  In many cases, the stories and things told to these people who have “died” contradicts revelation.  Jesus already gave us what we needed.  We have Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium of the Church to guide us.  There is no need to go and buy these books regarding people who claimed to have died and gone to heaven unless you are reading them as you would read a novel or something as entertainment.

Because of this retraction, many atheists and others are now collectively attacking all Christians believe all to be liars.  This is unfortunate indeed.  This is why the Catholic Church is not quick to approve alleged stories of apparitions or other events.  She investigates thoroughly each claim made. Even if she does approve of an apparition or event, she reminds the flock that these apparitions are not necessary and should point us to what has been revealed in the Sacred Deposit.

66 “The Christian economy, therefore, since it is the new and definitive Covenant, will never pass away; and no new public revelation is to be expected before the glorious manifestation of our Lord Jesus Christ.” Yet even if Revelation is already complete, it has not been made completely explicit; it remains for Christian faith gradually to grasp its full significance over the course of the centuries.

67 Throughout the ages, there have been so-called “private” revelations, some of which have been recognized by the authority of the Church. They do not belong, however, to the deposit of faith. It is not their role to improve or complete Christ’s definitive Revelation, but to help live more fully by it in a certain period of history. Guided by the Magisterium of the Church, the sensus fidelium knows how to discern and welcome in these revelations whatever constitutes an authentic call of Christ or his saints to the Church.

Christian faith cannot accept “revelations” that claim to surpass or correct the Revelation of which Christ is the fulfillment, as is the case in certain non-Christian religions and also in certain recent sects which base themselves on such “revelations.”

 – Catechism of the Catholic Church

Please be careful with whatever you encounter out there in God’s, Mary’s or the Church’s name. There is not need to go flock to view sites where people claim to have seen Mary or to anyone who claims to have the stigmata or any other supernatural gift.
Source:

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/jan/21/boy-who-came-back-from-heaven-alex-malarkey

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/style-blog/wp/2015/01/15/boy-who-came-back-from-heaven-going-back-to-publisher/

http://pulpitandpen.org/2015/01/13/the-boy-who-came-back-from-heaven-recants-story-rebukes-christian-retailers/